Revenge porn

Neymar Jr Vs. case analysis Najila Trindade, was the athlete committed the crime of article 218-C, § 1º of the criminal code?

Abstract

The present work aims to contextualize the innovations brought by Law no. 13.718 / 18, with the main scope of the practice known as Revenge Porn (Revenge Porn or Pornographic Revenge), also address its characterization in the light of Criminal Law. The Vengeance pornography phenomenon is approved by the disclosure without consent of photos, videos, audios and other types of media that contain intimate content of the victim, in the virtual environment (social networks, instant messaging applications, hosting on websites, among others). Consequently, this research has also studied the crimes arising from Law 13.718 / 18, and their conformation. After the analysis of the initial concepts about the fact, the applicability of the crime of art. 218-C, § 1 to the Neymar Jr. Vs. Najila Trindade case, since the author after being reported for rape, released images and conversations with the victim, without identification and a blurred face. Finally, it will be examined for the player's conduct in conjunction with the framing mechanisms of the criminal incriminating type and the possibility of criminal liability.