The constitutionality of the premium delation carried out by the police commissioner

Authors

  • Alexon Vilarino Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
  • Alan Pinheiro de Paula Universidade do Contestado (UnC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24302/acaddir.v3.3127

Keywords:

Constitutionality, State’s Evidende, Police Commissioner, Game Theory

Abstract

The winning complaint is considered an investigation technique through confession and provision of truthful information for the clarification of crimes. This work has as its object the constitutionality and legitimacy of the police chief, in the cases provided for by law, to apply this criminal investigation tool. The present study was carried out by the deductive method through bibliographic research, doctrine and jurisprudence carried out in Brazil. The objective is to search for cases using game theory through its rules, tactics and strategies. It seeks to reflect on the requirements, steps and procedures in the game of the winning sentence. It also seeks to observe the limits of game theory in the treatment of evidence and the rights of the whistleblower.It is concluded that the police chief justifies the criminal investigation, in accordance with the constitutional understanding, as well as having the legitimacy to carry out the winning complaint.

Author Biographies

Alexon Vilarino, Universidade do Contestado (UnC)

Acadêmico de Direito da Universidade do Contestado. Campus Mafra. Santa Catarina. Brasil.

Alan Pinheiro de Paula, Universidade do Contestado (UnC)

Mestre em Ciência Jurídica pela Univali. Docente da Universidade do Contestado. Campus Mafra. Santa Catarina. Brasil.

Published

2021-06-28

How to Cite

Vilarino, A., & Paula, A. P. de. (2021). The constitutionality of the premium delation carried out by the police commissioner. Academia De Direito, 3, 507–524. https://doi.org/10.24302/acaddir.v3.3127

Issue

Section

Artigos