The constitutionality of the premium delation carried out by the police commissioner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24302/acaddir.v3.3127Keywords:
Constitutionality, State’s Evidende, Police Commissioner, Game TheoryAbstract
The winning complaint is considered an investigation technique through confession and provision of truthful information for the clarification of crimes. This work has as its object the constitutionality and legitimacy of the police chief, in the cases provided for by law, to apply this criminal investigation tool. The present study was carried out by the deductive method through bibliographic research, doctrine and jurisprudence carried out in Brazil. The objective is to search for cases using game theory through its rules, tactics and strategies. It seeks to reflect on the requirements, steps and procedures in the game of the winning sentence. It also seeks to observe the limits of game theory in the treatment of evidence and the rights of the whistleblower.It is concluded that the police chief justifies the criminal investigation, in accordance with the constitutional understanding, as well as having the legitimacy to carry out the winning complaint.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Academia de Direito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.