Determinants of the participation of the field population in the RMSP labor market

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24302/drd.v13.3716

Abstract

Given the importance of the participation of the rural population in the labor market, the present study evaluates the behavior of the determinants of such insertion through an econometric model that estimates the chances of an individual being economically active, the Probit model. This model is a type of regression analysis suitable for datasets where a dependent variable is a binary choice. The determinants that had the greatest impact in terms of increasing participation were: education, age, position at home and race. In order to make a comparison between genders, it also estimates the participation for men and women separately. Among the differences found, the main one was that, although the impact of education on the studied probability was the most important among the factors analyzed for both genders, it was more marked among women for the highest levels of education. Another important result was the variables of household heads and whether the person is married, being marked by men and women, respectively.

Keywords: Labor Market. PEA. Metropolitan region of Sao Paulo.

Author Biographies

Leandro Batista Duarte, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana

Doutor em Economia. Professor do DCIS da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS). Feira de Santana. Bahia. Brasil.

Maria Orlandia de Melo Belmiro, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz

Pós graduada em Educação do Campo. Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC). Ilhéus. Bahia. Brasil.

Arlete Ramos dos, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Pós-Doutorado em Educação e Movimentos Sociais do Campo. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP). Vitória da Conquista. Bahia. Brasil.

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

Duarte, L. B. ., Belmiro, M. O. de M., & Arlete Ramos dos. (2023). Determinants of the participation of the field population in the RMSP labor market. DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional Em Debate, 13, 170–188. https://doi.org/10.24302/drd.v13.3716

Issue

Section

Artigos